marketing run by people who can change the code
search, content, and campaigns without the handoff. when the fix is technical we do it ourselves: schema, speed, a broken tracking script, a landing page that needs rebuilding.
what we run
a short list done properly beats a long list done for the report.
- technical seo & site speed
- keyword & intent research
- ai search visibility (geo)
- content strategy & writing
- landing pages & cro
- local seo & map listings
- analytics & conversion tracking
- email & lifecycle campaigns
- paid search setup
- monthly reporting in plain english
showing up inside AI answers
a growing share of buyers ask chatgpt, gemini, or perplexity before they ever open google. those answers are assembled from sources, and you can work on being one of them on purpose. it's called generative engine optimisation, and it isn't the same job as seo.
- track how often you're named for the prompts your buyers actually type
- see which competitors get cited instead, and from which sources
- fix the structural reasons you're invisible: schema, crawlability, thin pages
- build the source material these systems reach for: comparisons, specifics, real numbers
- report it monthly against named competitors instead of vanity metrics
why the code access matters
most marketing retainers stall in the same place. the agency writes the recommendation, then it waits in a developer queue for six weeks. we don't have that queue.
an audit, then a waiting list
you get a 40-page pdf of findings. your developer gets a ticket. the ticket ages. next month's report explains why the numbers didn't move, and recommends the same fixes again.
find it, fix it, ship it
we find the slow template, the missing schema, the tracking that stopped firing in march, and we fix it that week, because we have the repository open already. the report tells you what we changed.